The Insurance Expert

Entries from May 2009

Are Your Property Transfers and Acquisitions at Risk?

May 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Over the past several years, exclusions for mold, microbial matter and lead-based paint have consistently appeared on general liability policies to create substantial coverage gaps.

As a result, uncovered claims can be significant. Take, for instance, the discovery of mold in an apartment community in the State of Delaware. A leaking kitchen sink was the verified cause of discoloration and foul odor in a bedroom ceiling as well as the dark-rimmed holes in the bedroom ceiling.

Despite repeated complaints, building management was slow to respond resulting in health-related issues for the two women living in the apartment. During the law suit, the women demonstrated that the owners rarely performed repairs beyond cosmetic patchwork. After two weeks of testimony, the jury awarded $1.04 million to the complainants for personal injuries.

Another example of catastrophic loss occurred at a condominium complex in the Northeast. It included the sickening of two people as well as the death of a 50-year-old woman who contracted Legionnaire’s Disease. The resulting effects included evacuating the entire complex, disinfecting the water system and a significant law suit.

As the above-mentioned situations show, habitational property owners have significant environmental worries.

Other environmental risks commonly associated with habitational real estate may include, but are not limited to:

  • Contaminants from known and unknown historical usage/operations or neighboring properties
  • Construction debris containing hazardous materials
  • Sick Building Syndrome i.e. carbon monoxide, mold, or bacterial air releases from faulty heating, ventilation or air conditioning systems
  • Hazardous chemical storage (such as maintenance degreasers, pool chemicals, pesticides and herbicides used both indoors and outdoors)
  • Lead, asbestos, polychlorinated byphenols (PCBs)
  • “Midnight dumping” on vacant land parcels
  • Leaking underground or aboveground storage tanks or piping.

Managing the risks

Despite the obvious challenges, environmental liabilities needn’t be an obstacle to property transfers and acquisitions if they are proactively identified, managed and mitigated.
In recent years, habitational real estate developers and owners alike have mitigated their environmental exposures through contractual means, the use of environmental insurance or the combination of both. This trend is also likely to continue due to the ever-increasing need of financial institutions to protect their loans in today’s economic climate and the desire of sellers, who would prefer to be free from potential claims related to unknown legacy issues.

At the top of the ($2.5B annual premium) environmental insurance market are the five leading environmental liability insurers of AIG, XL Capital, Zurich, ACE USA, and Chubb, which account for approximately 90 percent of the total premiums written. However, the remaining 10 percent of the environmental liability insurance market is growing with a number of very solid insurers providing at least some form of environmental liability insurance. These markets include Liberty, Markel Underwriting Managers, American Safety, Freberg Environmental/Endurance and Great American.

Available coverages

Each environmental liability insurer offers its own manuscripted coverage forms. To complicate matters even more, each insurer also offers a portfolio of environmental liability coverage forms, with the largest offering up to 15 different coverages totaling over 100 forms in the marketplace.

Among these is Premises Environmental Liability/Pollution Legal Liability (PLL), which provides coverage for pollution conditions or events on, at, under or migrating from a covered location(s). Coverage is afforded for third-party bodily injury, property damage, clean up costs and legal defense expense. A unique feature of many PLL policies is their ability to offer various and different coverage parts under one policy form. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • New pollution conditions
  • Existing pollution conditions
  • On site clean-up coverage
  • Transportation coverage
  • Non Owned Disposal Site (NODS) coverage
  • Business interruption including Loss of Rental Income
  • Mold liability coverage and clean-up
  • Legionella coverage
  • Fines and Penalties and Punitive Damages where allowable by law
  • Natural Resource Damages.

PLL is an effective risk management tool for commercial real estate since it helps to fill the “environmental gap” left in most general liability policies. It also helps reduce the uncertainty about environmental liability associated with the property and provides simple asset protection from potentially catastrophic environmental events associated with day-to-day operations.

In today’s environmental insurance market, available programs can even be tailored to address the diverse needs of each property and then structured to meet a variety of requirements that include regulatory obligations, contract requirements, lender requirements, landlord obligations, and business objectives. Another important aspect of coverage offered under PLL is that it can be structured to provide coverage for contamination, even if it is known certain environmental conditions already exist on site.

Fortunately, the environmental insurance marketplace is continually adapting to keep pace with the growing risk management demands of real estate owners and lenders—demands that are not likely to subside in the near future due to the costly nature of environmental liabilities.

Categories: Apartment Complexes & Buildings · Business Insurance · Commercial Real Estate · Condominium and Homeowner Associations · INSURANCE NEWS
Tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

BLOGGERS, BEWARE: WHAT YOU WRITE CAN GET YOU SUED

May 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

(The Wall Street Journal)                         A growing number of lawsuits are being filed against bloggers based on a wide variety of allegations, from defamation to copyright infringement. The Citizen Media Law Project at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University reports that 106 civil lawsuits were filed against bloggers and others in social networks and online forums in 2007, compared with 12 such lawsuits filed in 2003. According to the Media Law Resource Center in New York, approximately $17.4 million has been awarded in trials against bloggers so far. Although many lawsuits are dismissed or settled before trial, the risks for bloggers are expanding. One blogger recently named in a lawsuit was fortunate because her legal defense was covered by her personal umbrella insurance policy from Allstate Corp. These policies provide additional liability protection, often including defamation, libel and slander, coverage that varies according to the insurer, policy language and state law. Standard homeowners policies generally do not protect bloggers from lawsuits but many personal umbrella policies do. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. and some other insurers offer protection in many states from the risk of lawsuits for something written or posted online as part of a special personal injury endorsement to a homeowners policy. Bloggers are advised to check with insurers on the specifics of their policies. According to the Insurance Information Institute, a $1 million umbrella policy costs an average of $200 to $350 a year in addition to regular homeowners and auto premiums.

Categories: Homeowners · INSURANCE NEWS · Umbrella
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WHY LIFE? A short video

May 22, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Categories: Life · Personal Insurance · VIDEO MESSAGES
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

MONEY STEERS SEAT BELT DEBATE

May 18, 2009 · Leave a Comment

USA Today (Grassroots Wire).- In these times of deep budget gaps, states have more incentive to take advantage of transportation grants that Congress has made available to those that enact “primary” seatbelt laws. The program expires on June 30. Currently 28 states and the District of Columbia have primary seatbelt laws, which allow law enforcement officers to stop people solely for not buckling up; 21 states have “secondary” laws, which permit police to ticket motorists for not wearing seatbelts only if they are first stopped for another offense. New Hampshire has no seatbelt law for adults. Florida and Arkansas recently enacted primary laws, making available about $35 million and $9.5 million in federal funds, respectively. Other states considering primary laws include Minnesota, Missouri, Vermont and Wisconsin. Proposals to strengthen seatbelt laws failed this year in Colorado, Kansas, Nevada and New Hampshire.

Safety Belt Laws in Arizona

Arizona’s Governor’s Office of Highway Safety

ARS Title 28-909 (A)

Each front seat occupant must have the lap and shoulder belt properly adjusted and fastened while the vehicle is in motion. If only a lap belt is installed, the lap belt must be properly adjusted, and fastened while the vehicle is in motion.

ARS Title 28-909 (B)

A citation will be issued to the driver for each passenger under 16 years of age that is occupying the front seat and is not wearing a seat belt.

ARS Title 28-909 (F)

Exemptions: persons with physical or medical disability waivers, mail carriers, and children under 5 years of age (child restraint required).

Child Restraint Safety Checklist

When traveling with a young child, you need to understand all the facets of child restraints.

At what age is a child restraint no longer necessary?
Is there still a weight restriction for child restraints?
How should I position my child restraint in the vehicle?

Correcting mistakes made when installing child safety seats could save a life. The most common mistakes are:

  • Never place rear facing infants in front seat with passenger-side air bags.
  • Infant (under one year AND 20 pounds) should always face the rear of the vehicle.
  • Child safety seat needs to be anchored in vehicle by a safety belt.
  • Child must be buckled in a child safety seat.
  • Child safety seat harness straps in slot at or below infant’s shoulder (rear facing) and at or above toddler’s shoulder (forward facing).
  • Harness straps need to be snug – no more than one adult finger should fit under harness.
  • Harness retainer clip must be at armpit level to hold harness strap properly over shoulders.
  • Vehicle safety belt must hold child safety seat tightly and be threaded through correct belt path of child safety seat.
  • Check child safety seat for correct size/type for child’s weight and age.

Child Restraint Laws for Arizona

Having our young children properly restrained in our vehicles is not an option, in Arizona it is required by law !

ARS 28-907 (A) and (B)

The driver will be cited if they fail to properly secure a child under 5 years of age in a child restraint device that meets federal standards.
NOTE: No weight limitation as of October 1, 1997

ARS 28-907 (C)

Driver is subject to a civil penalty of $50 plus court imposed surcharges, unless a person makes a sufficient showing that the motor vehicle has been subsequently equipped with a child restraint device.

ARS 28-907 (G)

Exemptions: Motor vehicles originally manufactured without seat belts (prior to 1972), recreational vehicles, public transportation, buses, school bus, transporting a child in an emergency to obtain medical care, or the interior design of vehicle makes use impractical for multiple child restraint devices.

Infant Seats

Birth to 20 Pounds (birth to age one):

Infants should be in a reclined infant car seat or convertible seat in the infant position to protect the delicate neck and head. All straps should be pulled snugly. The car seat must face the rear of the car and should never be used in a front seat where there is an air bag. The infant must face the rear so that in the event of a crash, swerve, or sudden stop, the infant’s back and shoulders can better absorb the impact. Household infant carriers and cloth carriers are not designed to protect an infant in a car and should never be used.
Please never place any toys or mirrors around or near the child’s face. During a crash these objects become flying projectiles and will injure your child.

Convertible Seats

5 to 40 Pounds :

The convertible car seat is placed in a reclined rear-facing position until an infant is 1 year and 20 pounds.
After children reach at least 1 year and 20 pounds, the convertible seat can be turned forward and placed in the upright position in the back seat of the vehicle.
Fasten the convertible car seat with a vehicle seat belt, properly inserting the belt through the car seat frame according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Read the vehicle owner’s manual for specific instructions. A locking clip is needed when using a vehicle lap/shoulder belt with a latch plate that moves freely along the belt.

Booster Seats

40 to 80 Pounds :

When a child outgrows the convertible car seat or weighs about 40 pounds, either a belt positioning (backless) or high-back booster seat can be used with a lap/shoulder belt in the back seat of the vehicle. For those vehicles that do not have lap/shoulder belts, the options are limited:
1.) Retrofit the vehicle with shoulder belts,
2.) Use a harness or vest system,
3.) Purchase a new booster seat with harnesses that secure to the vehicle seat with the lap belt.
Feel free to contact GOHS for current product information.

Buckle Up Baby Campaign

If you observe a child under the age of 8 not properly restrained while riding in a motor vehicle, you can do something about it.
Call the “Buckle Up, Baby” hotline number 1-800-505-BABY, a GOHS program supported by the Phoenix Police Department.

How the program works: Persons may call the 1-800 number and leave the following information:

  • Vehicle license number and state.
  • City observed in.
  • Where the child was sitting in the vehicle.

A packet of useful information is mailed to the registered owner stating that their vehicle was observed transporting an unrestrained child. The material describes the hazards of transporting unrestrained children under the age of 8, and encourages the owner to purchase a child restraint system. This information is not provided to any law enforcement agencies, insurance companies, or the Arizona Motor Vehicles Division. The purpose of this program is to provide information to those who might need it most.

Categories: Automobile · INSURANCE NEWS · Personal Insurance
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,